Gay marriage, then group marriage?

first_imgCNN March 20, 2013 –  Robert P. George and Sherif Girgis and Ryan T. Anderson,The attractive civil rights rhetoric of “marriage equality” masks a profound error about what marriage is. Of course, if marriage were simply about recognizing bonds of affection or romance, then two men or two women could form a marriage just as a man and woman can. But so could three or more in the increasingly common phenomenon of group (“polyamorous”) partnerships. In that case, to recognize opposite-sex unions but not same-sex or polyamorous ones would be unfair — a denial of equality. But marriage is far more than your emotional bond with “your Number One person,” to quote same-sex marriage proponent John Corvino. Just as the act that makes marital love also makes new life, so marriage itself is a multilevel — bodily as well as emotional — union that would be fulfilled by procreation and family life. That is what justifies its distinctive norms — monogamy, exclusivity, permanence — and the concept of marital consummation by conjugal intercourse. It is also what explains and justifies the government’s involvement in marriage.But don’t take our word for it. Many prominent leaders of the campaign to redefine marriage make precisely the same point. (We provide many more examples, and full citations, in the amicus brief we filed with the Supreme Court on the harms of redefining marriage.) University of Calgary Professor Elizabeth Brake supports “minimal marriage,” in which people distribute whichever duties they choose, among however many partners, of whatever sex. NYU Professor Judith Stacey hopes that redefining marriage would give marriage “varied, creative, and adaptive contours …” and lead to acceptance of “small group marriages.” In the manifesto “Beyond Same-Sex Marriage,” 300 leading “LGBT and allied” scholars and activists call for the recognition of multiple partner relationships. Influential columnist and “It Gets Better” founder Dan Savage encourages spouses to adopt “a more flexible attitude” about sex outside their marriage. Journalist Victoria Brownworth cheerfully predicts that same-sex marriage will “weaken the institution of marriage.” “It most certainly will do so,” she says, “and that will make marriage a far better concept than it previously has been.” Author Michelangelo Signorile urges same-sex partners to “demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society’s moral codes but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution.” They should “fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, because the most subversive action lesbians and gay men can undertake … is to transform the notion of ‘family’ entirely.” These leading same-sex marriage advocates are correct. Redefining marriage would, by further eroding its central norms, weaken an institution that has already been battered by widespread divorce, out-of-wedlock child bearing and the like.http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/20/opinion/george-gay-marriage/index.html?iid=article_sidebarlast_img read more

Read More →

Anthony Joshua sizes up £1.1m diamond

first_imgRelatedPosts Tyson Fury to Anthony Joshua: Don’t risk fighting Usyk Anthony Joshua, Okolie plot world title double Anthony Joshua wants Tyson Fury, Wilder fight Anthony Joshua took a close look at an expensive diamond worth £1.1 million during a trip to the jewellers over the weekend. Britain’s unified WBA, IBF & WBO heavyweight champion of the world is known to have made tens of millions in his career so far, but still marvelled at the price of the gem. In a social media video, Joshua noted how he allowed his 16-year-old cousin to experience “what £1.1 million feels like.” After speaking to the shop assistant who informed him about the item he was wearing, AJ said: “This right here is £1.1 million…” He then turned back to the assistant and joked: “I’ll take five of these please.” Joshua’s next fight is set to be against mandatory challenger Kubrat Pulev, which details are now being ironed out regarding the date and venue. Promoter Eddie Hearn previously told talkSPORT: “It’s been difficult because Kubrat Pulev doesn’t really wanna box in the UK. “He’s a mandatory challenger, he’s saying: ‘Oh, we can get more money here, more money there.’ “Joshua’s basically put a line through that and said: ‘I don’t care, my next fight is in the UK.’ “That fight will take place in June, the frontrunner right now is Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. “We’ve still got a bit of work to do but you can expect an announcement in the next two weeks.”Tags: Anthony JoshuatalkSPORTlast_img read more

Read More →